The schism between Dave Duncan and everybody else is getting bigger, and it could lead to his departure at the end of the season.
I realize that the posting schedule here has been a little erratic here lately, and I apologize for not having fresh, relevant content for you to read each morning as you "work" or, like me, "study." Truth is, school and life comes first, even in the midst of one of the strongest Cardinals ballclubs in the past decade, and I'm still trying to get as much in order as a college kid can.
I did want to comment on the new drama that's erupted on a, for the most part, drama-less team. The schism that's appearing between Dave Duncan and the Cardinals seems like it's widening, and there seem to be many to blame but none at fault for the divide.
Joe Strauss writes for the P-D:
[Dave Duncan] is angry — publicly so at a St. Louis media he believes stoked last month's trade of his outfielder son Chris to the Boston Red Sox and, until now, privately at a franchise that has created a minor-league pitching philosophy independent of his and bullpen coach Marty Mason's input.
The latter half of that statement is, what I believe, will be the undoing of Dave Duncan, much more so than the exile of his son. Duncan's disapproval is great enough that Strauss writes that many believe it is a "precursor to him leaving after this season, " which "only gained steam last week when Duncan asked general manager John Mozeliak for a one-day leave of absence upon the team's return from a 5-2 West Coast trip to address "personal business."
In short, Dave Duncan is unhappy about two things - the way his son was treated by the organization and its fanbase, and the way he's being usurped by the FO in pitcher development. Sadly, I don't really see this finding a happy ending, as Duncan has been quick to call the media's bluff but never has criticized his own organization quite as much as he has recently.
I do believe that Chris Duncan always did carry the burden of being a coach's son, but the nonsense of him being "unfairly treated" is overblown. Tony La Russa mentions Duncan's '06 stretch as something to give Chris credibility, but for the past year and a half, Duncan has had almost zero value. That's not an exaggeration, his Runs Above Replacement (RAR) in '08 was 0.7 and this year was -3.3. In the same way that Jason Isringhausen was escorted out, in the same way Jim Edmonds was escorted out, Chris Duncan was treated just like all the others.
There was a variety of reasons why Chris was traded, including the fact that he would be due for arbitration next year, and trading him now brought the bounty of Julio Lugo for a year and a half, with his entire $13.5 million remaining salary paid for by Boston. Lugo alone has played at a 4.4 RAR level in just his time in St. Louis. Best of all, his acquisition gives us a ton of leverage next year.
The trade was a really, really good one, especially now since Chris was released by Boston a week ago and could be had for free. Chris, in fact, was given the benefit of a doubt for almost two years. It's apparent he was injured, and more should have been done by all parties to address it. It was a wonder that he was even able to start playing again after his surgery, but his refusal to acknowledge that there was something wrong - doing so would probably have won him even more credibility - and the club's refusal to force it down on him, left everyone involved as a reason his lack of performance wasn't justified.
I'm sure I'm generalizing the situation a lot from the complexities that factor into it, but the constant complaining that Chris Duncan was undone by the organization and its fans is annoying and untrue. If Duncan was hurt, he should have said so. If he wasn't hurting, then his performance truly was terrible and should have been replaced, like he was.
All in all, it's a hairy situation, and I hope we don't lose Dave Duncan, one of the greatest pitching coaches of all-time, because of it.
Read the rest of this post...